Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Bank capital to total assets
Bank capital to total assets over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 20.3% against 18.0% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th and Serbia ranks 3rd of 139 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to total assets, Equatorial Guinea or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 20.3% against 18.0% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2015.
- What is the difference in bank capital to total assets between Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
- 2.3%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Serbia rank globally for bank capital to total assets?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th and Serbia ranks 3rd of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Ratio of bank capital and reserves to total assets. Capital and reserves include funds contributed by owners, retained earnings, general and special reserves, provisions, and valuation adjustments. Capital includes tier 1 capital (paid-up shares and common stock), which is a common feature in all countries' banking systems, and total regulatory capital, which includes several specified types of subordinated debt instruments that need not be repaid if the funds are required to maintain minimum capital levels (these comprise tier 2 and tier 3 capital). Total assets include all nonfinancial and financial assets. Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.