Cape Verde vs Hong Kong, China: Bank cost to income ratio
Cape Verde
51.7%
in 2021
Hong Kong, China
50.6%
in 2021
Cape Verde rank
108th
Hong Kong, China rank
110th
Bank cost to income ratio over time
- Cape Verde
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 51.7% against 50.6% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 108th and Hong Kong, China ranks 110th of 169 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.1% | 44.5% | 21.6% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 70.2% | 52.9% | 17.3% | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 52.7% | 47.7% | 5.0% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank cost to income ratio, Cape Verde or Hong Kong, China?
- Cape Verde, at 51.7% against 50.6% in Hong Kong, China as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank cost to income ratio between Cape Verde and Hong Kong, China?
- 1.1%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Hong Kong, China?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Cape Verde and Hong Kong, China rank globally for bank cost to income ratio?
- Cape Verde ranks 108th and Hong Kong, China ranks 110th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank cost to income ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090 / (data2080 + data2085). All Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.