Chile vs Nepal: Bank cost to income ratio
Chile
45.2%
in 2021
Nepal
44.5%
in 2021
Chile rank
137th
Nepal rank
139th
Bank cost to income ratio over time
- Chile
- Nepal
How they compare
Chile currently reports 45.2% against 44.5% in Nepal, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 137th and Nepal ranks 139th of 169 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.3% | 51.2% | 3.1% | Chile |
| 2010s | 48.9% | 45.0% | 3.9% | Chile |
| 2020s | 50.8% | 44.2% | 6.6% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank cost to income ratio, Chile or Nepal?
- Chile, at 45.2% against 44.5% in Nepal as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank cost to income ratio between Chile and Nepal?
- 0.7%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nepal?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Chile and Nepal rank globally for bank cost to income ratio?
- Chile ranks 137th and Nepal ranks 139th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank cost to income ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090 / (data2080 + data2085). All Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.