Hong Kong, China vs Zimbabwe: Bank cost to income ratio
Hong Kong, China
50.6%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
49.7%
in 2021
Hong Kong, China rank
110th
Zimbabwe rank
113th
Bank cost to income ratio over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 50.6% against 49.7% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 169 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.9% | 53.1% | 8.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 52.9% | 67.0% | 14.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 47.7% | 51.4% | 3.7% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank cost to income ratio, Hong Kong, China or Zimbabwe?
- Hong Kong, China, at 50.6% against 49.7% in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank cost to income ratio between Hong Kong, China and Zimbabwe?
- 0.9%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Zimbabwe rank globally for bank cost to income ratio?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank cost to income ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090 / (data2080 + data2085). All Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.