Malaysia vs Rwanda: Bank cost to income ratio
Malaysia
43.4%
in 2021
Rwanda
43.0%
in 2021
Malaysia rank
141st
Rwanda rank
144th
Bank cost to income ratio over time
- Malaysia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 43.4% against 43.0% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Rwanda ahead.
Malaysia ranks 141st and Rwanda ranks 144th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.5% | 75.3% | 34.8% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 41.9% | 66.0% | 24.0% | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 45.2% | 43.1% | 2.1% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank cost to income ratio, Malaysia or Rwanda?
- Malaysia, at 43.4% against 43.0% in Rwanda as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank cost to income ratio between Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 0.4%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2021.
- How do Malaysia and Rwanda rank globally for bank cost to income ratio?
- Malaysia ranks 141st and Rwanda ranks 144th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank cost to income ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090 / (data2080 + data2085). All Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.