Malta vs South Sudan: Bank cost to income ratio
Malta
76.1%
in 2021
South Sudan
76.2%
in 2019
Malta rank
12th
South Sudan rank
11th
Bank cost to income ratio over time
- Malta
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 76.2% against 76.1% in Malta, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 12th and South Sudan ranks 11th of 169 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank cost to income ratio, Malta or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 76.2% against 76.1% in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in bank cost to income ratio between Malta and South Sudan?
- 0.1%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and South Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Malta and South Sudan rank globally for bank cost to income ratio?
- Malta ranks 12th and South Sudan ranks 11th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank cost to income ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090 / (data2080 + data2085). All Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.