Oman vs Peru: Bank cost to income ratio
Oman
48.6%
in 2021
Peru
49.2%
in 2021
Oman rank
122nd
Peru rank
119th
Bank cost to income ratio over time
- Oman
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 49.2% against 48.6% in Oman, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Peru ahead.
Oman ranks 122nd and Peru ranks 119th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.2% | 58.0% | 12.8% | Peru |
| 2010s | 48.6% | 46.4% | 2.2% | Oman |
| 2020s | 48.5% | 47.9% | 0.6% | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank cost to income ratio, Oman or Peru?
- Peru, at 49.2% against 48.6% in Oman as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank cost to income ratio between Oman and Peru?
- 0.6%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Peru?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Oman and Peru rank globally for bank cost to income ratio?
- Oman ranks 122nd and Peru ranks 119th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank cost to income ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090 / (data2080 + data2085). All Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.