Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Jordan: Bank non-performing loans to gross loans
Bosnia and Herzegovina
6.1%
in 2020
Jordan
5.7%
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
49th
Jordan rank
52nd
Bank non-performing loans to gross loans over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Jordan
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 6.1% against 5.7% in Jordan, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jordan ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 49th and Jordan ranks 52nd of 141 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.5% | 10.7% | 3.2% | Jordan |
| 2010s | 10.3% | 5.5% | 4.8% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank non-performing loans to gross loans, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Jordan?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 6.1% against 5.7% in Jordan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank non-performing loans to gross loans between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan?
- 0.4%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan rank globally for bank non-performing loans to gross loans?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 49th and Jordan ranks 52nd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.