Chile vs El Salvador: Bank non-performing loans to gross loans
Chile
1.6%
in 2020
El Salvador
1.6%
in 2020
Chile rank
118th
El Salvador rank
115th
Bank non-performing loans to gross loans over time
- Chile
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 1.6% against 1.6% in Chile, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was El Salvador ahead.
Chile ranks 118th and El Salvador ranks 115th of 141 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.4% | 2.8% | 1.4% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 2.1% | 2.5% | 0.4% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.0% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank non-performing loans to gross loans, Chile or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 1.6% against 1.6% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank non-performing loans to gross loans between Chile and El Salvador?
- 0.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and El Salvador?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
- How do Chile and El Salvador rank globally for bank non-performing loans to gross loans?
- Chile ranks 118th and El Salvador ranks 115th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.