Chile vs Malaysia: Bank non-performing loans to gross loans
Chile
1.6%
in 2020
Malaysia
1.6%
in 2020
Chile rank
118th
Malaysia rank
116th
Bank non-performing loans to gross loans over time
- Chile
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1.6% against 1.6% in Chile, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Malaysia ahead.
Chile ranks 118th and Malaysia ranks 116th of 141 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.6% | 17.6% | 16.0% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 1.4% | 10.8% | 9.3% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 2.1% | 1.9% | 0.2% | Chile |
| 2020s | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.0% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank non-performing loans to gross loans, Chile or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 1.6% against 1.6% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank non-performing loans to gross loans between Chile and Malaysia?
- 0.0%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malaysia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Malaysia rank globally for bank non-performing loans to gross loans?
- Chile ranks 118th and Malaysia ranks 116th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.