Colombia vs Sri Lanka: Bank non-performing loans to gross loans
Colombia
4.8%
in 2020
Sri Lanka
4.9%
in 2020
Colombia rank
61st
Sri Lanka rank
58th
Bank non-performing loans to gross loans over time
- Colombia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 4.9% against 4.8% in Colombia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Colombia ranks 61st and Sri Lanka ranks 58th of 141 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.3% | 3.7% | 0.5% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 4.8% | 4.9% | 0.1% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank non-performing loans to gross loans, Colombia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 4.9% against 4.8% in Colombia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank non-performing loans to gross loans between Colombia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.1%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Sri Lanka rank globally for bank non-performing loans to gross loans?
- Colombia ranks 61st and Sri Lanka ranks 58th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.