Ecuador vs Latvia: Bank non-performing loans to gross loans
Ecuador
3.2%
in 2019
Latvia
3.1%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
83rd
Latvia rank
84th
Bank non-performing loans to gross loans over time
- Ecuador
- Latvia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 3.2% against 3.1% in Latvia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 83rd and Latvia ranks 84th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.1% | 6.0% | 11.1% | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 8.8% | 3.0% | 5.8% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 3.5% | 7.6% | 4.1% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank non-performing loans to gross loans, Ecuador or Latvia?
- Ecuador, at 3.2% against 3.1% in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in bank non-performing loans to gross loans between Ecuador and Latvia?
- 0.1%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for bank non-performing loans to gross loans?
- Ecuador ranks 83rd and Latvia ranks 84th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.