Hong Kong, China vs Lithuania: Bank non-performing loans to gross loans
Hong Kong, China
0.9%
in 2020
Lithuania
1.0%
in 2020
Hong Kong, China rank
131st
Lithuania rank
129th
Bank non-performing loans to gross loans over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 1.0% against 0.9% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Lithuania ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 131st and Lithuania ranks 129th of 141 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.2% | 12.7% | 6.4% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 3.1% | 6.2% | 3.1% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 9.2% | 8.5% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.9% | 1.0% | 0.1% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank non-performing loans to gross loans, Hong Kong, China or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 1.0% against 0.9% in Hong Kong, China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank non-performing loans to gross loans between Hong Kong, China and Lithuania?
- 0.1%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Lithuania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Lithuania rank globally for bank non-performing loans to gross loans?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 131st and Lithuania ranks 129th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.