Hong Kong, China vs Luxembourg: Bank non-performing loans to gross loans
Hong Kong, China
0.9%
in 2020
Luxembourg
1.0%
in 2020
Hong Kong, China rank
131st
Luxembourg rank
128th
Bank non-performing loans to gross loans over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 1.0% against 0.9% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 131st and Luxembourg ranks 128th of 141 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.2% | 0.5% | 5.8% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2000s | 3.1% | 0.4% | 2.7% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.1% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 0.9% | 1.0% | 0.1% | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank non-performing loans to gross loans, Hong Kong, China or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 1.0% against 0.9% in Hong Kong, China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank non-performing loans to gross loans between Hong Kong, China and Luxembourg?
- 0.1%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Luxembourg?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Luxembourg rank globally for bank non-performing loans to gross loans?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 131st and Luxembourg ranks 128th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.