Kazakhstan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Bank non-performing loans to gross loans
Kazakhstan
8.4%
in 2020
Tanzania, United Republic of
8.7%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
32nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
30th
Bank non-performing loans to gross loans over time
- Kazakhstan
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 8.7% against 8.4% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 32nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 30th of 141 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.2% | 8.1% | 5.2% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 8.4% | 8.7% | 0.3% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank non-performing loans to gross loans, Kazakhstan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 8.7% against 8.4% in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank non-performing loans to gross loans between Kazakhstan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.3%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for bank non-performing loans to gross loans?
- Kazakhstan ranks 32nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 30th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.