New Zealand vs Sweden: Bank non-performing loans to gross loans
New Zealand
0.5%
in 2015
Sweden
0.5%
in 2020
New Zealand rank
137th
Sweden rank
136th
Bank non-performing loans to gross loans over time
- New Zealand
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0.5% against 0.5% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 137th and Sweden ranks 136th of 141 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.0% | 0.5% | 0.5% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 1.2% | 0.9% | 0.4% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank non-performing loans to gross loans, New Zealand or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0.5% against 0.5% in New Zealand as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank non-performing loans to gross loans between New Zealand and Sweden?
- 0.0%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sweden?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2015.
- How do New Zealand and Sweden rank globally for bank non-performing loans to gross loans?
- New Zealand ranks 137th and Sweden ranks 136th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.