Algeria vs Bangladesh: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Algeria
- Bangladesh
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 20.7% against 19.0% in Bangladesh, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Algeria's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Algeria has been ahead every year.
Algeria ranks 3rd and Bangladesh ranks 4th of 151 countries.
Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Bangladesh | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12.1% | 7.5% | 4.6% | Algeria |
| 2020s | 19.5% | 10.6% | 8.9% | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Algeria or Bangladesh?
- Algeria, at 20.7% against 19.0% in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Algeria and Bangladesh?
- 1.7%, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Bangladesh?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Algeria and Bangladesh rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Algeria ranks 3rd and Bangladesh ranks 4th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.