Barbados vs Eswatini: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Barbados
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 6.7% against 5.8% in Barbados, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Eswatini ahead.
Barbados ranks 37th and Eswatini ranks 34th of 151 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.4% | 9.1% | 2.7% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 6.6% | 7.2% | 0.6% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Barbados or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 6.7% against 5.8% in Barbados as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Barbados and Eswatini?
- 0.9%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Eswatini?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2022.
- How do Barbados and Eswatini rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Barbados ranks 37th and Eswatini ranks 34th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.