Brazil vs Uganda: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Brazil
- Uganda
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 3.9% against 3.9% in Uganda, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 63rd and Uganda ranks 64th of 151 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5% | 2.3% | 1.2% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 2.9% | 4.7% | 1.8% | Uganda |
| 2020s | 2.4% | 4.8% | 2.4% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Brazil or Uganda?
- Brazil, at 3.9% against 3.9% in Uganda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Brazil and Uganda?
- 0.0%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Uganda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Uganda rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Brazil ranks 63rd and Uganda ranks 64th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.