Curaçao vs Kazakhstan: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Curaçao
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 3.6% against 3.5% in Curaçao, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Curaçao's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Curaçao ranks 68th and Kazakhstan ranks 66th of 151 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Curaçao averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curaçao | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.9% | 7.8% | 1.9% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 5.3% | 3.9% | 1.4% | Curaçao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Curaçao or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 3.6% against 3.5% in Curaçao as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Curaçao and Kazakhstan?
- 0.1%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Kazakhstan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Curaçao and Kazakhstan rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Curaçao ranks 68th and Kazakhstan ranks 66th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.