Kyrgyzstan vs Sri Lanka: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 10.1% against 9.9% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 22nd and Sri Lanka ranks 23rd of 151 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 7.0% | 3.7% | 3.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 10.4% | 9.6% | 0.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Kyrgyzstan or Sri Lanka?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 10.1% against 9.9% in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Kyrgyzstan and Sri Lanka?
- 0.2%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Sri Lanka?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Sri Lanka rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 22nd and Sri Lanka ranks 23rd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.