Macau, China vs Russian Federation: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Macau, China
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 4.5% against 4.4% in Macau, China, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Macau, China ranks 53rd and Russian Federation ranks 50th of 151 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macau, China | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2% | 8.0% | 7.8% | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 6.1% | 4.6% | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Macau, China or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 4.5% against 4.4% in Macau, China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Macau, China and Russian Federation?
- 0.1%, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Russian Federation?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Macau, China and Russian Federation rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Macau, China ranks 53rd and Russian Federation ranks 50th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.