Malawi vs Seychelles: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Malawi
- Seychelles
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 5.1% against 4.7% in Seychelles, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Seychelles's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Seychelles ahead.
Malawi ranks 44th and Seychelles ranks 47th of 151 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.8% | 5.2% | 1.6% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 4.9% | 5.9% | 1.0% | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Malawi or Seychelles?
- Malawi, at 5.1% against 4.7% in Seychelles as of 2023.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Malawi and Seychelles?
- 0.4%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Seychelles?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Seychelles rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Malawi ranks 44th and Seychelles ranks 47th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.