Malta vs North Macedonia: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Malta
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 2.0% against 1.9% in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Malta ranks 114th and North Macedonia ranks 117th of 151 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.2% | 9.9% | 3.7% | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 6.3% | 8.3% | 2.0% | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 3.3% | 2.7% | 0.6% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Malta or North Macedonia?
- Malta, at 2.0% against 1.9% in North Macedonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Malta and North Macedonia?
- 0.1%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and North Macedonia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Malta and North Macedonia rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Malta ranks 114th and North Macedonia ranks 117th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.