Sint Maarten (Dutch part) vs Sri Lanka: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 11.2% against 9.9% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 21st and Sri Lanka ranks 23rd of 151 countries.
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11.9% | 4.1% | 7.9% | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) |
| 2020s | 11.2% | 7.1% | 4.0% | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Sint Maarten (Dutch part) or Sri Lanka?
- Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 11.2% against 9.9% in Sri Lanka as of 2022.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Sint Maarten (Dutch part) and Sri Lanka?
- 1.3%, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sint Maarten (Dutch part) and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Sint Maarten (Dutch part) and Sri Lanka rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 21st and Sri Lanka ranks 23rd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.