Solomon Islands vs Sri Lanka: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Solomon Islands
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 11.6% against 9.9% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.2 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Solomon Islands ranks 20th and Sri Lanka ranks 23rd of 151 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.9% | 3.7% | 2.1% | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 10.3% | 9.5% | 0.8% | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Solomon Islands or Sri Lanka?
- Solomon Islands, at 11.6% against 9.9% in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Solomon Islands and Sri Lanka?
- 1.7%, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Sri Lanka?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Solomon Islands and Sri Lanka rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Solomon Islands ranks 20th and Sri Lanka ranks 23rd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.