Tajikistan vs Tonga: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Tajikistan
- Tonga
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 13.7% against 13.5% in Tonga, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Tonga ahead.
Tajikistan ranks 16th and Tonga ranks 18th of 151 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25.3% | 7.2% | 18.1% | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 18.7% | 3.5% | 15.2% | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Tajikistan or Tonga?
- Tajikistan, at 13.7% against 13.5% in Tonga as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Tajikistan and Tonga?
- 0.2%, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Tonga?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
- How do Tajikistan and Tonga rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Tajikistan ranks 16th and Tonga ranks 18th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.