Argentina vs Zimbabwe: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Argentina
7.2%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
8.0%
in 2021
Argentina rank
3rd
Zimbabwe rank
2nd
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Argentina
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 8.0% against 7.2% in Argentina, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 3rd and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.5% | 7.6% | 1.9% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 6.9% | 9.2% | 2.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 7.7% | 6.4% | 1.2% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Argentina or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 8.0% against 7.2% in Argentina as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Argentina and Zimbabwe?
- 0.8%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Argentina and Zimbabwe rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Argentina ranks 3rd and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.