Botswana vs El Salvador: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Botswana
3.7%
in 2021
El Salvador
3.8%
in 2021
Botswana rank
39th
El Salvador rank
36th
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Botswana
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 3.8% against 3.7% in Botswana, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was El Salvador ahead.
Botswana ranks 39th and El Salvador ranks 36th of 168 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.2% | 3.3% | 0.9% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 4.2% | 3.7% | 0.5% | Botswana |
| 2020s | 3.9% | 3.8% | 0.1% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Botswana or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 3.8% against 3.7% in Botswana as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Botswana and El Salvador?
- 0.1%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and El Salvador?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Botswana and El Salvador rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Botswana ranks 39th and El Salvador ranks 36th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.