Burkina Faso vs Sri Lanka: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Burkina Faso
1.9%
in 2020
Sri Lanka
1.9%
in 2021
Burkina Faso rank
95th
Sri Lanka rank
96th
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Burkina Faso
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 1.9% against 1.9% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 96th of 168 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.0% | 2.6% | 0.3% | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 1.9% | 2.0% | 0.1% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Burkina Faso or Sri Lanka?
- Burkina Faso, at 1.9% against 1.9% in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Burkina Faso ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 96th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.