Chad vs Tanzania: Bank overhead costs to total assets (%)
Chad
5.5%
in 2016
Tanzania
5.1%
in 2021
Chad rank
15th
Tanzania rank
17th
Bank overhead costs to total assets (%) over time
- Chad
- Tanzania
How they compare
Chad currently reports 5.5% against 5.1% in Tanzania, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tanzania ahead.
Chad ranks 15th and Tanzania ranks 17th of 168 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.5% | 5.9% | 0.4% | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 5.0% | 6.1% | 1.1% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Chad or Tanzania?
- Chad, at 5.5% against 5.1% in Tanzania as of 2016.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Chad and Tanzania?
- 0.4%, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Tanzania?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.
- How do Chad and Tanzania rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Chad ranks 15th and Tanzania ranks 17th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.