China vs Lithuania: Bank overhead costs to total assets
China
0.8%
in 2021
Lithuania
0.9%
in 2021
China rank
160th
Lithuania rank
157th
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- China
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.9% against 0.8% in China, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times China's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
China ranks 160th and Lithuania ranks 157th of 168 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.3% | 3.3% | 2.0% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 1.0% | 1.4% | 0.4% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.1% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, China or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 0.9% against 0.8% in China as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between China and Lithuania?
- 0.1%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Lithuania?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do China and Lithuania rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- China ranks 160th and Lithuania ranks 157th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.