China vs Singapore: Bank overhead costs to total assets
China
0.8%
in 2021
Singapore
0.9%
in 2021
China rank
160th
Singapore rank
158th
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- China
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0.9% against 0.8% in China, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China ahead.
China ranks 160th and Singapore ranks 158th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.3% | 0.8% | 0.4% | China |
| 2010s | 1.0% | 0.9% | 0.1% | China |
| 2020s | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.1% | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, China or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 0.9% against 0.8% in China as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between China and Singapore?
- 0.1%, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Singapore?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do China and Singapore rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- China ranks 160th and Singapore ranks 158th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.