Croatia vs Nepal: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Croatia
1.7%
in 2021
Nepal
1.7%
in 2021
Croatia rank
109th
Nepal rank
106th
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Croatia
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 1.7% against 1.7% in Croatia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 109th and Nepal ranks 106th of 168 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.9% | 2.6% | 0.3% | Croatia |
| 2010s | 2.2% | 2.1% | 0.1% | Croatia |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 1.7% | 0.1% | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Croatia or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 1.7% against 1.7% in Croatia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Croatia and Nepal?
- 0.0%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Nepal?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Croatia and Nepal rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Croatia ranks 109th and Nepal ranks 106th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.