Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Eswatini
6.4%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
8.0%
in 2021
Eswatini rank
5th
Zimbabwe rank
2nd
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Eswatini
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 8.0% against 6.4% in Eswatini, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Eswatini ranks 5th and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 168 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.7% | 7.6% | 1.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 6.1% | 9.2% | 3.1% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Eswatini or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 8.0% against 6.4% in Eswatini as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 1.6%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Zimbabwe rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Eswatini ranks 5th and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.