Hong Kong, China vs Norway: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 1.0% against 0.9% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 156th and Norway ranks 153rd of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.8% | 1.5% | 0.3% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 2.3% | 0.9% | 1.4% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 0.9% | 1.0% | 0.1% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Hong Kong, China or Norway?
- Norway, at 1.0% against 0.9% in Hong Kong, China as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Hong Kong, China and Norway?
- 0.1%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Norway?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Norway rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 156th and Norway ranks 153rd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.