Iraq vs New Zealand: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Iraq
1.0%
in 2021
New Zealand
1.0%
in 2021
Iraq rank
152nd
New Zealand rank
151st
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Iraq
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Iraq, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 152nd and New Zealand ranks 151st of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.9% | 1.3% | 1.7% | Iraq |
| 2010s | 1.5% | 1.1% | 0.5% | Iraq |
| 2020s | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.2% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Iraq or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Iraq as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Iraq and New Zealand?
- 0.0%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and New Zealand?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Iraq and New Zealand rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Iraq ranks 152nd and New Zealand ranks 151st of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.