Korea vs North Macedonia: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Korea
1.4%
in 2021
North Macedonia
1.3%
in 2021
Korea rank
128th
North Macedonia rank
129th
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Korea
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Korea currently reports 1.4% against 1.3% in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Korea ranks 128th and North Macedonia ranks 129th of 168 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.5% | 4.8% | 3.3% | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 1.6% | 2.5% | 0.9% | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 1.6% | 0.1% | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Korea or North Macedonia?
- Korea, at 1.4% against 1.3% in North Macedonia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Korea and North Macedonia?
- 0.1%, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and North Macedonia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Korea and North Macedonia rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Korea ranks 128th and North Macedonia ranks 129th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.