Latvia vs Nepal: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Latvia
1.7%
in 2021
Nepal
1.7%
in 2021
Latvia rank
108th
Nepal rank
106th
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Latvia
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 1.7% against 1.7% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 108th and Nepal ranks 106th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.1% | 2.6% | 0.5% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.9% | 2.1% | 0.2% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 1.9% | 1.7% | 0.2% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Latvia or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 1.7% against 1.7% in Latvia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Latvia and Nepal?
- 0.0%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nepal?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Latvia and Nepal rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Latvia ranks 108th and Nepal ranks 106th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.