Latvia vs Oman: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Latvia
1.7%
in 2021
Oman
1.6%
in 2021
Latvia rank
108th
Oman rank
111th
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Latvia
- Oman
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1.7% against 1.6% in Oman, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 108th and Oman ranks 111th of 168 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.1% | 2.3% | 0.8% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.9% | 1.8% | 0.0% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 1.9% | 1.6% | 0.3% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Latvia or Oman?
- Latvia, at 1.7% against 1.6% in Oman as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Latvia and Oman?
- 0.1%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Oman?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Latvia and Oman rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Latvia ranks 108th and Oman ranks 111th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.