Macau, China vs Singapore: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Macau, China
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0.9% against 0.8% in Macau, China, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Macau, China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Macau, China ahead.
Macau, China ranks 161st and Singapore ranks 158th of 168 countries.
Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macau, China | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.4% | 0.6% | 0.8% | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 1.4% | 0.9% | 0.5% | Macau, China |
| 2020s | 1.0% | 0.9% | 0.1% | Macau, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Macau, China or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 0.9% against 0.8% in Macau, China as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Macau, China and Singapore?
- 0.1%, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Singapore?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Macau, China and Singapore rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Macau, China ranks 161st and Singapore ranks 158th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.