Mauritania vs Peru: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Mauritania
2.6%
in 2020
Peru
2.6%
in 2021
Mauritania rank
65th
Peru rank
64th
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Mauritania
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 2.6% against 2.6% in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Mauritania ahead.
Mauritania ranks 65th and Peru ranks 64th of 168 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.6% | 4.7% | 0.1% | Peru |
| 2010s | 3.6% | 3.7% | 0.1% | Peru |
| 2020s | 2.6% | 2.7% | 0.1% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Mauritania or Peru?
- Peru, at 2.6% against 2.6% in Mauritania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Mauritania and Peru?
- 0.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Peru?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
- How do Mauritania and Peru rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Mauritania ranks 65th and Peru ranks 64th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.