Namibia vs Sudan: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Namibia
4.1%
in 2021
Sudan
4.3%
in 2012
Namibia rank
30th
Sudan rank
27th
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Namibia
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 4.3% against 4.1% in Namibia, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 30th and Sudan ranks 27th of 168 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.8% | 6.2% | 1.4% | Sudan |
| 2010s | 4.4% | 5.2% | 0.7% | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Namibia or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 4.3% against 4.1% in Namibia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Namibia and Sudan?
- 0.2%, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2012.
- How do Namibia and Sudan rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Namibia ranks 30th and Sudan ranks 27th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.