Pakistan vs Sri Lanka: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Pakistan
1.9%
in 2021
Sri Lanka
1.9%
in 2021
Pakistan rank
94th
Sri Lanka rank
96th
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Pakistan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 1.9% against 1.9% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 94th and Sri Lanka ranks 96th of 168 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.6% | 2.6% | 0.0% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 2.1% | 1.9% | 0.1% | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Pakistan or Sri Lanka?
- Pakistan, at 1.9% against 1.9% in Sri Lanka as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Pakistan and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
- How do Pakistan and Sri Lanka rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Pakistan ranks 94th and Sri Lanka ranks 96th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.