Rwanda vs Sudan: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Rwanda
4.3%
in 2021
Sudan
4.3%
in 2012
Rwanda rank
26th
Sudan rank
27th
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Rwanda
- Sudan
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 4.3% against 4.3% in Sudan, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 26th and Sudan ranks 27th of 168 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.8% | 5.7% | 2.1% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 8.3% | 5.2% | 3.2% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Rwanda or Sudan?
- Rwanda, at 4.3% against 4.3% in Sudan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Rwanda and Sudan?
- 0.0%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2012.
- How do Rwanda and Sudan rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Rwanda ranks 26th and Sudan ranks 27th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.