San Marino vs South Africa: Bank overhead costs to total assets
San Marino
3.0%
in 2017
South Africa
2.9%
in 2021
San Marino rank
56th
South Africa rank
57th
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- San Marino
- South Africa
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 3.0% against 2.9% in South Africa, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was South Africa ahead.
San Marino ranks 56th and South Africa ranks 57th of 168 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.5% | 3.2% | 1.7% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 2.8% | 3.1% | 0.4% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, San Marino or South Africa?
- San Marino, at 3.0% against 2.9% in South Africa as of 2017.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between San Marino and South Africa?
- 0.1%, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and South Africa?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2017.
- How do San Marino and South Africa rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- San Marino ranks 56th and South Africa ranks 57th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.