Sierra Leone vs Zimbabwe: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Sierra Leone
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 9.0% against 8.0% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 168 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.5% | 7.6% | 0.9% | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 8.5% | 9.2% | 0.7% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Sierra Leone or Zimbabwe?
- Sierra Leone, at 9.0% against 8.0% in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe?
- 1.0%, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2019.
- How do Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Sierra Leone ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.