Suriname vs Tunisia: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Suriname
2.2%
in 2019
Tunisia
2.2%
in 2021
Suriname rank
85th
Tunisia rank
83rd
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Suriname
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 2.2% against 2.2% in Suriname, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Suriname ahead.
Suriname ranks 85th and Tunisia ranks 83rd of 168 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.4% | 2.2% | 1.2% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 3.0% | 2.3% | 0.6% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Suriname or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 2.2% against 2.2% in Suriname as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Suriname and Tunisia?
- 0.0%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Tunisia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Suriname and Tunisia rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Suriname ranks 85th and Tunisia ranks 83rd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.