Chile vs Nigeria: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Chile
14.7%
in 2020
Nigeria
15.1%
in 2020
Chile rank
122nd
Nigeria rank
120th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Chile
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 15.1% against 14.7% in Chile, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Nigeria ahead.
Chile ranks 122nd and Nigeria ranks 120th of 141 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.0% | 15.8% | 2.8% | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 13.3% | 16.7% | 3.4% | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 13.4% | 14.6% | 1.2% | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 14.7% | 15.1% | 0.4% | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Chile or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 15.1% against 14.7% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Chile and Nigeria?
- 0.4%, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nigeria?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Nigeria rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Chile ranks 122nd and Nigeria ranks 120th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.