Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Chile
Chile: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets was 14.7% in 2020. ▬ Flat
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Chile, 1998–2020
Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Chile is 14.7%, measured in 2020. That is the highest value across all 23 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 14.3% on the previous year and up 3.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Chile peaked at 14.7% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 12.2%, in 2007.
Chile ranks 122nd of 141 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Chile, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1998 | 12.5% | — |
| 1999 | 13.5% | +8.0% |
| 2000 | 13.3% | -1.5% |
| 2001 | 12.7% | -4.5% |
| 2002 | 14.0% | +10.2% |
| 2003 | 14.1% | +0.7% |
| 2004 | 13.6% | -3.5% |
| 2005 | 13.0% | -4.4% |
| 2006 | 12.5% | -3.8% |
| 2007 | 12.2% | -2.4% |
| 2008 | 12.5% | +2.5% |
| 2009 | 14.3% | +14.4% |
| 2010 | 14.1% | -1.1% |
| 2011 | 13.9% | -1.4% |
| 2012 | 13.3% | -4.5% |
| 2013 | 13.3% | +0.1% |
| 2014 | 13.4% | +0.5% |
| 2015 | 12.6% | -5.7% |
| 2016 | 13.8% | +9.2% |
| 2017 | 13.8% | -0.1% |
| 2018 | 13.3% | -3.2% |
| 2019 | 12.8% | -3.6% |
| 2020 | 14.7% | +14.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.0% | 12.5% | 13.5% | 2 |
| 2000s | 13.2% | 12.2% | 14.3% | 10 |
| 2010s | 13.4% | 12.6% | 14.1% | 10 |
| 2020s | 14.7% | 14.7% | 14.7% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 119 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 15.1% compare
- 120 Nigeria 15.1% compare
- 121 China 14.7% compare
- 123 Republic of Korea 14.6% compare
- 124 Macau, China 14.5% compare
- 125 Honduras 14.5% compare
More financial sector data for Chile
- Net domestic credit (current LCU), per capita 14.07 million current LCU per person (2025)
- Net domestic credit (current LCU), per unit of GDP 781.99 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Net domestic credit (current LCU), annual growth rate 3.69 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gold reserves at 35 SDRs per ounce 276,500 SDR (2025)
- Gold reserves at market value 25.20 million SDR (2025)
- Reserves excluding gold, foreign exchange 33.11 billion SDR (2025)
- Reserves excluding gold 36.08 billion SDR (2025)
- Total reserves (gold at market value) 36.11 billion SDR (2025)
- Total reserves (gold at national valuation) 36.11 billion SDR (2025)
- Total reserves (gold at national valuation) (SDR), per capita 1,818 SDR per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Chile?
- Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Chile was 14.7% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
- What is the highest bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 14.7% in 2020.
- What is the lowest bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 12.2% in 2007.
- How does Chile rank for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Chile ranks 122nd out of 141 countries with data for 2020.
- Is bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.